Again, I’d like to thank Dasmenneke for having totally translated my interview on Tapahont.info. You can find the first part of the interview here.
Best regards
Lionel, CrowdSpirirt Founder
RFly: Why aren’t there then French Version when there is a majority of french people in the team ?
Lionel: First off, our bussiness model is clearly universal and so it’s international. We have 2 types of audiences, the audience for the communicative platform and the audience mainly consistent of buyers, the 2 are intimitely connected, and the first is a prequisite for the second
For the first, we’re confronted with very little problems if our audience understands english and we’ve put a reward system in place for this geographical coverage. It would be very sad to limit it to the french community, even if not the majority of our public comes from english speaking countries most people understand it.
The numbers of the current users strenghten us in our strategy
Because we have visitors from approximately more then 100 countries
Lead by the English speaking countriest: United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australie, etc… but offcourse also from non English speaking countries like France, Germany, Korea, The Netherlands, Brasil, etc…
The second key component of this project, namely the community of buyers, will have access to our products trough the Local salesman who will supply himself trough our central distributor. Those last ones offer a coverage in more then 100 countries. So we’ll have an approach in place to progressively cover all those countries starting with North America and Europe. It’s is important to note that we’ve deliberately decided to not address the direct-sale to clients firstly to leave this delicate and very important task to experts in this matter, meaning the resellers, and secondly to concentrate us on the most important part of our job (managing the platform and connect the industrial partners with the community) too consolidate and develop our activity
Additionally, our team has international experience, so this isn’t a problem for an international development
Finally, it is of the utmost importance to position us as a innovator and leader in the world to take care that we’re not passed by, given the universal aspect of our business model. For the moment, the results are encouraging cause we’re leading the pack in the domain of (type in crowdsourcing in Del.ico.us or Technorati and you’ll see that we’re in a very good position). The biggest challenge in front of us is preaching or even more making common the concept of crowdsourcing which is far from being the case. We’re counting on the entrance of the big shots to “enjoy the waves” they’ll make with their announcements, like the one from Amazon of the dematerialization of the production of their products
(see here) which is clearly are strategy … but let’s be patient.
Extra note: We’ve put in our long term strategy the option of creating a Multilanguage platform but it’s impossible to do that in a nearby future confronted with the complexities of this task.
RFly: I’ve seen that certain ones of you don’t like soap Opera, why is that ?
Lionel: I’m going to give you a fairly serious response, to get out of my difficult situation, But for me, I think that life is to precious to waste it in front of tv-programs however intresting… Everyone does what he wants with his life in my opinion, but I myself prefer 1000x more to pass the time with dreaming, walking (especially in the mountains), discuss with my friends and my family more then spending time in front of a television that doesn’t add (much) extra value… that’s only me and I don’t have anything against people who love Soap Opera While on the other hand some people think I’m crazy to waste my time on a crazy project!!! Everyone has the same amount of time whatever they do with it.
RFly: Do you already have contact with certain companies? Financers?
Lionel: Yes, we’re already in contact with industrial partners but we want to wait for the perfect moment before signing contracts cause we think that the potential of our community is only in it’s infancy for the moment although it already is very important and a great supporter.
On the subject of financial partners, we have not made a single contact for the moment because we’re busy assuring our current development on our own funds. That are investors who we’ve already contacted in a spontaneous manner, which encourages us to work “freely”, which is very reassuring combined with the attraction of our business model
RFly: How do you think you’re going to make money?
Lionel: Contrary to the many web 2.0 start ups, our business model is based on a realistic and possible economic model and relatively independent from the traffic generated by our web platform. To recap, the community will be paid based on the profit part of sales generated by sales of products to end-consumers. We think we’ll be able to sell our first products at the end of 2007.
RFly: Do you already have an idea how the person at the base of an idea will be integrated in the process?
Lionel: Yes, we already have a good idea how we’re going to integrate those key people in our business model. You first have to distinguish 2 types of people in this case:
In the case of the person who proposes a new product idea, we call that person an inventor. This one will receive commercial offers and will accept or not accept of confronting his idea with the community to realize the commercialization. The commercial offer will be in function of the advancement level of the idea of the person. It will be about the place of the product in the market.
In the case of a person who proposes an idea improving on a current project, this person will receive a reward in function of his contributing level like all the other contributors who take part in different tasks.
Those 2 roles can be occupied by the same person and can improve his chances of cashing in. It’s free for all to chose their participation level.
RFly: Patents, stolen ideas, simultaneous ideas… does it bother you in your sleep?
Lionel: For patents we do a precedent research before commercializing the product and when we get the green light, we send an envelope of the Soleau type to the INPI to guarantee our exploitation rights even if a competitor came to deposit a patent. If a patent has already been deposited, we wont commercialize the product unless the patentee would like to use our service to commercialize his idea which is imaginable.
To avoid the problems with simultaneous ideas, we guard a trace of the date of submission of the idea and a trace of all submitted ideas. An active guard by the community will permit the guarantee of the > and > of the idea.
For the problem of stolen ideas, that is certainly a critical problem and we’re busy at the moment thinking about using a licensing principal to guard us from this risk. When that will be done, it will be the best proof to justify the strong ness of our business model when a big group would go to commercialize one of our ideas… and I’m certain that we’re already “being watched”;).
RFly: How will you select the members of your community? Will the work of everyone be public?
Lionel: There won’t be any selection of the members of the community. Everyone can participate, the business model is clearly universal.
RFly: Can you announce a launch date? - the response is clearly no but when I reread the interview I told myself that I had to ask you.
Lionel: Thanks for asking Richard but you’ve nicely presented the answer. It would be dishonest to predict you a launch date when the work in front of us is huge.
RFly: Do you daily use services from web 2.0? Which one is your favorite?
Lionel: In risk of disappointing you, I’m not a big user of web 2.0 services and I don’t really have a favorite. Nevertheless I use services like Technorati, Bloglines, Del.ico.us, Pandora, Wikipedia, Dailymotion, CambrianHouse aussi;) etc…
RFly:Thx Lionel, for taking the time to explain us this a bit crazy concept